If a man buys a horse, … you have no argument against material implication: on a flaw in the foundations of the restrictor approach to conditionals

The paper discusses a prominent one of Kratzer’s (1986, 1991, 2012) arguments against material implication analyses the denotation (indicative) conditional sentences. This is argument based on sentence Most time, if man buys horse, he pays cash for it. It shown that makes prediction does conform to speakers’ intuitions, contrary claim. also argues Lewis’s (1975) attack sentences examples where embedded under adverbials sometimes and never not have much force given interpretation such subject inferential pragmatic operations in addition recovery their denotation.